Screenings and Dialogues 6

Subject is not scheduled Not scheduled

Code Completion Credits Range Language Instruction Semester
373PD6 ZK 1 3T Czech summer

Subject guarantor

Name of lecturer(s)

Learning outcomes of the course unit

The aim of the screenings is a group audience experience framed with introductions and group discussions. In order to expand this on-going process an analytical text is required at the end of the semester.

Mode of study

This course consists of screenings in the large hall at the City Library. Prior to screenings is an introduction and subsequent moderated discussion. Often there is the participation of the filmmaker. At the end of the semester the submitted texts are evaluated.

Prerequisites and co-requisites

Participation in screenings. Some presented films may be view from DVD but the real group screening and subsequenty discussion are part of the key experience in this course.

Course contents

This course is a series of heterogenic screenings and subsequent discussions with space for the participation of all school study years and studies.

Attendance at film screenings and discussions is possible without registering for the course in the year's study plan. Those who register for the course must fulfill the conditions necessary for a grade. Information regarding the program is posted on the board on the 1st floor of Lažanský Palace, in the current events of FAMU and on the pages of the City Library.

Recommended or required reading

Užitečné pojmy, jejichž hlubší pochopení lze využít při psaní filmových analýz:

Assessment methods and criteria


The required text is an analysis of one of the screened films which focuses on the structural features of a work (that is; style, narrative form, poetry of an element) and its relationship to the topic, or plot of the film.

The text should not devot too much space to a description of events, facts about the film or filmmaker.

I ask that you write your own analysis of a film. This means do not write what the film is about but write about the events only when an event when you interpret it from your perspective. Write your own observations. It is not important that you write you own philosophical-psychological abstract moody analysis of the film or analysis and evaluation of individual aspects (that is, for example: camera, editing, directing, screenplay analysis, etc.), but do not forget to write concrete arguments why you believe that the incriminated film has that asset or liability you write about. Or write only what assets or liabilities there are but try to more precisely say WHY it is that way, as you write.

Do not fall into the usual affliction of our contemporary daily press reviewers which write trivially what happens in the film with out any argument affixing some superficial brand, maintaining the consumption spirit of today. Their review can hardly be considered a critique.

Try to develop your own film view: factual items of interest and relationship consider only in particular connects to your own original view on this or that aspect of the piece.


5400 characters including spaces, that is, 3 standard pages. Exact data may be given by your text editor, ex: in MS WORD it can be found in the „File“ menu under „Characteristics“, under the the title „statistical data.“


Name the file such: „yoursurname-filmtitle.rtf“.

Send you work in electronic form to this email address:

The work must be submitted by Jan. 18, at the latest.

The header is to include the title of the film being analysed and your name and surname. Without these items you work will not be graded.

Also, students not satisfied with the grade on the work may consider sitting an exam. Dates and times for the exam will be announced in the exam period times.

Course web page



Screenings are in the large hall of the Prague City Library.

Further information

No schedule has been prepared for this course

The subject is a part of the following study plans